Volume 1, Issue 2 (2020)
J Clinic Care Skill 2020, 1(2): 75-80 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
2- Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran , R115_rastian@yahoo.com
2- Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran , R115_rastian@yahoo.com
Abstract: (1773 Views)
Aims: Several studies have shown controversy over the effectiveness of various educational methods. This study was performed with the aim of comparing the effect of face-to-face education and educational booklet on health-related quality of life in patients suffering from type 2 diabetes.
Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial study, which was conducted in 2017, 120 patients qualified to enter the study were selected by random sampling; they were randomly allocated to 3 groups, including, face-to-face group, education through booklet, and control group. The data were collected through Diabetes Quality of Life-Brief Clinical Inventory (DQL-BCI). Patients in the two intervention groups were presented with materials with the same educational content, but different teaching methods. The data were analyzed by SPSS 21, using Chi-square, one-way analysis of variance, paired t-test, and Tukey's post hoc test.
Findings: Before intervention, mean score of health-related quality of life in patients in the 3 groups was not statistically significant (p=0.1). After intervention, there was a significant difference between the mean score of health-related quality of life of patients in intervention groups and control group (p=0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the patients in face-to-face and education through booklet groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The effect of face-to-face education and educational booklet on health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes is the same.
Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial study, which was conducted in 2017, 120 patients qualified to enter the study were selected by random sampling; they were randomly allocated to 3 groups, including, face-to-face group, education through booklet, and control group. The data were collected through Diabetes Quality of Life-Brief Clinical Inventory (DQL-BCI). Patients in the two intervention groups were presented with materials with the same educational content, but different teaching methods. The data were analyzed by SPSS 21, using Chi-square, one-way analysis of variance, paired t-test, and Tukey's post hoc test.
Findings: Before intervention, mean score of health-related quality of life in patients in the 3 groups was not statistically significant (p=0.1). After intervention, there was a significant difference between the mean score of health-related quality of life of patients in intervention groups and control group (p=0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the patients in face-to-face and education through booklet groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The effect of face-to-face education and educational booklet on health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes is the same.
Keywords: Face-to-Face Education [MeSH], Health-Related Quality of Life [MeSH], Type 2 Diabetes [MeSH]
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2018/08/21 | Accepted: 2019/01/28 | Published: 2020/06/26
Received: 2018/08/21 | Accepted: 2019/01/28 | Published: 2020/06/26
References
1. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S62-9. [link] [DOI:10.2337/dc10-S062] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Bradshaw Kaiser A, Zhang N, Van Der Pluijm W. Global prevalence of type 2 diabetes over the next ten years (2018-2028). Diabetes. 2018;67(Supplement 1):202-LB. [link] [DOI:10.2337/db18-202-LB]
3. Heidari S, Raisi M, Ahmari Tehran H, Khorrami Rad A. Relationship between religious activities and spiritual health with glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Iran J Nurs. 2013;26(81):78-87. [Persian] [link]
4. Tabish SA. Is diabetes becoming the biggest epidemic of the twenty-first century? Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2007;1(2):5-8. [link]
5. Ahanchi NS, Eslami AA, Sharifirad G. Effects of family-based theory of social support on perceived support levels in type 2 diabetic patients. Health Syst Res. 2012;8(5):757-64. [Persian] [link]
6. Doosti Irani M, Abazari P, Babaei S, Shahgholian N. Facilitators ofadherence to self-management in type 2 diabetic patients: a phenomenological study. Iran J Endocrinol Metab. 2009;11(3):257-64. [Persian] [link]
7. Lewis CP, Newell JN. Patients' perspectives of care for type 2 diabetes in Bangladesh-a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):737. [link] [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-737] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Yin Sh, Njai R, Barker L, Siegel PZ, Liao Y. Summarizing health-related quality of life(HRQOL):development and testing of a one-factor model. Popul Health Metr. 2016;14:22. [link] [DOI:10.1186/s12963-016-0091-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Trikkalinou A, Papazafiropoulou AK, Melidonis A. Type 2 diabetes and quality of life. World J Diabetes. 2017;8(4):120-9. [link] [DOI:10.4239/wjd.v8.i4.120] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Masror Roudsari D, Dabiri Golchin M, Parsa yekta Z, Haghani H. Relationship between adherence to therapeutic regimen and health related quality of life in hypertensive patients. Iran J Nurs. 2013;26(85):44-54. [Persian] [link]
11. Palermo TM, Long AC, Lewandowski AS, Drotar D, Quittner AL, Walker LS. Evidence-based assessment of health-related quality of life and functional impairment in pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;33(9):983-96. [link] [DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn038] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Revicki DA, Kleinman L, Cella D. A history of health-related quality of life outcomes in psychiatry. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014;16(2):127-35. [link] [DOI:10.31887/DCNS.2014.16.2/drevicki] [PMCID]
13. Grandy S, Fox KM. EQ-5D visual analog scale and utility index values in individuals with diabetes and at risk for diabetes: Findings from the Study to Help Improve Early evaluation and management of risk factors Leading to Diabetes (SHIELD). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6(1):18. [link] [DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-6-18] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Holmes J, McGill S, Kind P, Bottomley J, Gillam S, Murphy M. Health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes (TARDIS-2). Value Health. 2000;3(Suppl 1):47-51. [link] [DOI:10.1046/j.1524-4733.2000.36028.x] [PMID]
15. Kooshyar H, Shoorvazi M, Dalir Z, Hosseini M. Health literacy and its relationship with medical adherence and health-related quality of life in diabetic community-residing elderly. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2014;23(1):133-43. [Persian] [link]
16. Koopmanschap M. Coping with type II diabetes: the patient's perspective. Diabetologia. 2002;45(7):S18-22. [link] [DOI:10.1007/s00125-002-0861-2]
17. Wexler DJ, Grant RW, Wittenberg E, Bosch JL, Cagliero E, Delahanty L, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006;49(7):1489-97. [link] [DOI:10.1007/s00125-006-0249-9] [PMID]
18. Carbone ET, Campbell MK, Honess-Morreale L. Use of cognitive interview technique in the development of nutrition surveys and interactive nutrition messages for low-income populations. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(5):690-6. [link] [DOI:10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90156-2]
19. Kashfi SM, Khani Jeyhouni A, Bahadori Khalili R, Hatami M. Evaluation of the effects of educating about nutrition and jogging on the blood sugar of type II diabetic patients of a clinic in Shiraz, Iran. Hakim. 2009;12(3):54-60. [Persian] [link]
20. Saeidpour J, Jafari M, Ghazi Asgar M, Dayani Dardashti H. Effect of educational program on quality of life in diabetic patients. J Health Adm. 2013;16(52):26-36. [Persian] [link]
21. Shirazi M, Anoosheh M, Rajab A. The effect of self care program education by group discussion method on self concept in diabetic adolescent girls reffered to Iranian Diabetes Society. Iran J Nurs Res. 2011;6(22):40-52. [Persian] [link]
22. Zamanzdeh V, Seyied Rasuli A, Jabbarzadeh F. The effect of empowerment program education on self efficacy in diabetic patients in Tabriz university of medical science diabetes education center. Res J Biol Sci. 2008;3(8):850-5. [link]
23. Vahedian Azimi A, Alhani F, Hedayat K. Barriers and facilitators of patients education nurses perspectives. Nurses' Perspectives. Iran J Med Educ. 2012;11(6):620-34. [Persian] [link]
24. Hekmatpou D, Anoosheh M, Alhani F. Pathology of patient education: a qualitative study. Iran J Nurs. 2007;20(49):51-60. [Persian] [link]
25. Khademian Z, mogharei M, Shokraian N. Comparison of the effect of face to face teaching and the educational booklet on the patient's learning after urologic surgical procedures. J Nurs Educ. 2012;1(1):70-7. [Persian] [link]
26. Noorian K, Rajaei M, Moazeni M, Aein F. Compare the effectiveness of face-to-face education with leaflet on preoperative knowledge of patients undergoing elective surgery- A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Nurs Midwifery. 2013;4(3):1-7. [Persian] [link]
27. Etemadi Sanandaji M, Ghahri Sarabi A, Bonakdar H, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, Banaderakhshan H, Ghasemi S. Comparison of impact of face to face and educational booklet methods on respiratory self efficacy of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease attending to selected hospitals of Shahid Beheshti university of medical sciences in Tehran. J Nurs Educ. 2015;4(1):1-7. [Persian] [link]
28. Rantonen J, Vehtari A, Karppinen J, Luoto S, Viikari-Juntura E, Hupli M, Malmivaara A, Taimela S. Face-to-face information combined with a booklet versus a booklet alone for treatment of mild low-ack pain: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40(2):156-66. [link] [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.3398] [PMID]
29. Bujang MA, Adnan TH, Mohd Hatta NKB, Ismail M, Lim CJ. A Revised version of diabetes quality of life instrument maintaining domains for satisfaction, impact, and worry. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018(ID 5804687);1-10. [link] [DOI:10.1155/2018/5804687] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Burroughs TE, Desikan R, Waterman BM, Gilin D, McGill J. Development and validation of the diabetes quality of life brief clinical inventory. Diabetes Spectr. 2004;17(1):41-9. [link] [DOI:10.2337/diaspect.17.1.41]
31. Nasihatkon AA, Phishva AR, Habibzadeh F, Tabatabaei M, Ghashghaeezadeh MT, et al. Determine the reliability and validity of diabetes quality of life- brief clinical inventory in Persian. Iran J Diabetes Metab. 2012;11(5):483-7. [Persian] [link]
32. Keulers BJ, Welters CF, Spauwen PH, Houpt P. Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based patient education? A randomised trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(1-2):176-82. [link] [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.012] [PMID]
33. Heikkinen K, Helena LK, Taina N, Anne K, Sanna S. A comparison of two educational interventions for the cognitive emprowerment of ambulatory orthopaedic surgery patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(2):272-9. [link] [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2008.06.015] [PMID]
34. Coudeyre E, Tubach F, Rannou F, Baron G, Coriat F, Brin S, Revel M, Poiraudeau S. Effect of a simple information booklet on pain persistence after an acute episode of low back pain: a non-randomized trial in a primary care setting. PLoS One. 2007;2(8):e706. [link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0000706] [PMID] [PMCID]
35. Angioli R, Plotti F, Capriglione S, Aloisi A, Aloisi ME, Luvero D, et al. The effects of giving patients verbal or written pre-operative information in gynecologic oncology surgery: a randomized study and the medical-legal point of view. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 ;177:67-71. [link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.041] [PMID]
36. Bjørnnes AK, Parry M, Lie I, Fagerland MW, Watt-Watson J, Rustøen T, et al. The impact of an educational pain management booklet intervention on postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017;16(1):18-27. [link] [DOI:10.1177/1474515116631680] [PMID]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |