IMEMR
EMRO
66.92
Index Copernicus
ICICICICICICICIC
Volume 1, Issue 2 (2020)
J Clinic Care Skill 2020, 1(2): 71-74 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
History
Received: 2018/10/6 | Accepted: 2019/10/11 | Published: 2020/06/26
Received: 2018/10/6 | Accepted: 2019/10/11 | Published: 2020/06/26
How to cite this article
Rabani S, Mousavizadeh A, Rabani S, Mosavi A. Circumcision Compressive Dressing (CCD). J Clinic Care Skill 2020; 1 (2) :71-74
URL: http://jccs.yums.ac.ir/article-1-61-en.html
URL: http://jccs.yums.ac.ir/article-1-61-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Urology Department, Medicine Faculty, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
2- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yusuj, Iran
3- Cellular & Molecular Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
4- Medical Surgical Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
2- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yusuj, Iran
3- Cellular & Molecular Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
4- Medical Surgical Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
Abstract (2535 Views)
Aims: Circumcision is a minor urologic surgery that is widely used in Iran and other Muslim and non-muslin countries. A common complication following this procedure is bleeding. The aim of this study was to compare compressive dressing with no dressing and conventional dressing options for circumcision in point of bleeding after circumcision.
Materials & Methods: Between October 2010 and July 2016, 126 boys underwent elective circumcision by a single surgeon and in a single center (Beheshti Teaching Hospital, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran). The patients were allocated in 3 groups by simple randomization method. The method of procedure was the same in 3 groups. In group one (42 boys) conventional dressing, group 2 (42 boys) no dressing, and in group 3 (42 boys) compressive dressing was done. Patients were followed for one week and outcomes were recorded and compared. Data were analyzed by SPSS 19 software using one-way analysis of variance and chi squared tests.
Findings: There was a significant difference between the group 3 and the other two groups in terms of post-operative bleeding (p=0.013). There were 15 reattendances for bleeding; 8 patients (19.0%) in group one, 7 patients (16.7%) in group 2 and no patients in group 3, but all had minimal bleeding and no life- threatening bleeding was encountered.
Conclusions: Bleeding is less by using compressive dressing compared to no dressing and conventional dressing in circumcision.
Materials & Methods: Between October 2010 and July 2016, 126 boys underwent elective circumcision by a single surgeon and in a single center (Beheshti Teaching Hospital, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran). The patients were allocated in 3 groups by simple randomization method. The method of procedure was the same in 3 groups. In group one (42 boys) conventional dressing, group 2 (42 boys) no dressing, and in group 3 (42 boys) compressive dressing was done. Patients were followed for one week and outcomes were recorded and compared. Data were analyzed by SPSS 19 software using one-way analysis of variance and chi squared tests.
Findings: There was a significant difference between the group 3 and the other two groups in terms of post-operative bleeding (p=0.013). There were 15 reattendances for bleeding; 8 patients (19.0%) in group one, 7 patients (16.7%) in group 2 and no patients in group 3, but all had minimal bleeding and no life- threatening bleeding was encountered.
Conclusions: Bleeding is less by using compressive dressing compared to no dressing and conventional dressing in circumcision.
Keywords:
References
1. Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Steele S. A review of the current state of the male circumcision literature. J Sex Med. 2014;11(12):2847-64. [link] [DOI:10.1111/jsm.12703] [PMID]
2. Ahmad A. do motives matter in male circumcision? 'Conscientious objection' against the circumcision of a Muslim child with a blood disorder. Bioethics. 2014;28(2):67-75. [link] [DOI:10.1111/bioe.12074] [PMID]
3. Hayford SR, Trinitapoli J. Religious differences in female genital cutting: a case study from Burkina Faso. J Sci Study Relig. 2011;50(2):252-71. [link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01566.x] [PMID]
4. Williams N, Kapila L. Complications of circumcision. Br J Surg. 1993;80(10):1231-6. [link] [DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800801005] [PMID]
5. Abdulwahab-Ahmed A, Mungadi IA. Techniques of male circumcision. J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2013;5(1):1-7. [link] [DOI:10.4103/2006-8808.118588] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Anike U, Govender I, Ndimande JV, Tumbo J. Complications of traditional circumcision amongst young Xhosa males seen at St Lucy's Hospital, Tsolo, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2013;5(1):488. [link] [DOI:10.4102/phcfm.v5i1.488] [PMCID]
7. Fox M, Thomson M. The new politics of male circumcision: HIV/AIDS, health law and social justice. Leg Stud. 2012;32(2):255-81. [link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00218.x]
8. Brusa M, Barilan YM. Cultural circumcision in EU public hospitals - an ethical discussion. Bioethics. 2009;23(8):470-82. [link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00683.x] [PMID]
9. Frisch M, Lindholm M, Gronbeck M. Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(5):1367-81. [link] [DOI:10.1093/ije/dyr104] [PMID]
10. Lyons B. Male infant circumcision as a 'HIV vaccine'. Public Health Ethics. 2013;6(1):90-103. [link] [DOI:10.1093/phe/phs039]
11. Mielke RT. Counseling parents who are considering newborn male circumcision. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013;58(6):671-82. [link] [DOI:10.1111/jmwh.12130] [PMID]