IMEMR
EMRO
66.92
Index Copernicus
ICICICICICICICIC
Volume 3, Issue 2 (2022)
J Clinic Care Skill 2022, 3(2): 53-57 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zoratipour A, Dabbaghi A, Ebrahimi Zaker M. Comparison of Strength and Retention of Fiberglass Post in Immediate and Delayed Post Space Preparation after Endodontic Treatment. J Clinic Care Skill 2022; 3 (2) :53-57
URL: http://jccs.yums.ac.ir/article-1-130-en.html
URL: http://jccs.yums.ac.ir/article-1-130-en.html
1- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
2- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
3- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran , milad.ebrahimizaker1987@gmail.com
2- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
3- Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran , milad.ebrahimizaker1987@gmail.com
Abstract: (862 Views)
Aims: Root canal treatment is one of the treatments that weakens the tooth crown. The use of fiberglass posts has been considered due to its effect on the strength of teeth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of post preparation time on the strength and retention of fiberglass posts after endodontic treatment.
Materials & Methods: In this experimental study, 48 samples were selected using convenience sampling method and randomly divided into two experimental groups of 24 samples (including immediate and 48 hours post space preparation after endodontic treatment). All samples were maxillary and single-channel. After roots preparation, the roots were washed with 5 ml of distilled water to remove debris and then dried with a paper cone (Aria Dent, Iran). Any residual goiter in the root wall was evaluated by radiography.
Findings: The mean strength (p=0.04) and the mean retention of fiberglass posts (p=0.001) in the group prepared immediately after the root canal treatment were significantly less than the group prepared 48 hours after the root canal treatment.
Conclusion: Post preparation after 48 hours of root canal treatment can increase the strength and retention of fiberglass posts.
Materials & Methods: In this experimental study, 48 samples were selected using convenience sampling method and randomly divided into two experimental groups of 24 samples (including immediate and 48 hours post space preparation after endodontic treatment). All samples were maxillary and single-channel. After roots preparation, the roots were washed with 5 ml of distilled water to remove debris and then dried with a paper cone (Aria Dent, Iran). Any residual goiter in the root wall was evaluated by radiography.
Findings: The mean strength (p=0.04) and the mean retention of fiberglass posts (p=0.001) in the group prepared immediately after the root canal treatment were significantly less than the group prepared 48 hours after the root canal treatment.
Conclusion: Post preparation after 48 hours of root canal treatment can increase the strength and retention of fiberglass posts.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/04/3 | Accepted: 2022/05/10 | Published: 2022/06/20
Received: 2022/04/3 | Accepted: 2022/05/10 | Published: 2022/06/20
References
1. Boone KJ, Murchison DF, Schjndler WG, Walker III WA. Post retention: The effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers. J Endod. 2001;27(12):768-71. [DOI:10.1097/00004770-200112000-00014] [PMID]
2. Trope M, Bergenholtz G. Microbiological basis for endodontic treatment: Can a maximal outcome be achieved in one visit?. Endod Top. 2002;1(1):40-53. [DOI:10.1034/j.1601-1546.2002.10104.x]
3. Dugas N, Lawrence H, Teplitsky P, Pharoah M, Friedman S. Periapical health and treatment quality assessment of root-filled teeth in two Canadian populations. Int Endod J. 2003;36(3):181-92. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00640.x] [PMID]
4. Tronstad L, Asbjørnsen K, Døving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen H. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000;16(5):218-21. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016005218.x] [PMID]
5. Grecca FS, Rosa ÂRG, Gomes MS, Parolo CF, Dutra Bemfica JR, da Fontoura Frasca LC, et al. Effect of timing and method of post space preparation on sealing ability of remaining root filling material: in vitro microbiological study. J Can Dent Assoc. 2009;75(8):583.
6. Güngör G, Türkaydın D, Tarçın B, Öveçoğlu H, Günday M, Oruçoğlu H. Comparison of apical sealing of two canal sealers between immediate versus delayed post space preparation. Marmara Dent J. 2013;1(1):20-3.[Turkish] [DOI:10.12990/MDJ2013122]
7. Aqrabawi JA. Outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth filled using lateral condensation versus vertical compaction (Schilder's technique). J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7(1):17-24. [DOI:10.5005/jcdp-7-1-17] [PMID]
8. Dos Reis-Prado AH, Abreu LG, Tavares WLF, Peixoto IFdC, Viana ACD, de Oliveira EMC, et al. Comparison between immediate and delayed post space preparations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(2):417-40. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-020-03690-x] [PMID]
9. Bohrer T, Fontana P, Rocha R, Kaizer O. Post-space treatment influences the bond strength in endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis of In vitro studies. Oper Dent. 2021;46(3):E132-57. [DOI:10.2341/19-277-LIT] [PMID]
10. Abramovitz I, Tagger M, Tamse A, Metzger Z. The effect of immediate vs. delayed post space preparation on the apical seal of a root canal filling: a study in an increased-sensitivity pressure-driven system. J Endod. 2000;26(8):435-9. [DOI:10.1097/00004770-200008000-00001] [PMID]
11. Rosatto CMPd, Oliveira LV, Ferraz DC, Soares PBF, Soares CJ, Moura CCG. Apical displacement and residual root canal filling with single-cone after post space preparation: A micro-CT analysis. Braz Dent J. 2020;31(1):25-31. [DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202002597] [PMID]
12. Yuanli H, Juan W, Mengzhen J, Xuan C, Kaixin X, Xueqin Y, et al. The effect of two endodontic sealers and interval before post-preparation and cementation on the bond strength of fiber posts. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(11):6211-7. [DOI:10.1007/s00784-021-03920-w] [PMID]
13. Aleisa K, Al-Dwairi ZN, Alsubait SA, Morgano SM. Pull-out retentive strength of fiber posts cemented at different times in canals obturated with a eugenol-based sealer. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(1):85-90. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.010] [PMID]
14. Machado MBM, Morgan LFdSA, Gomes GM, Vasconcellos WA, Cardoso FP, de Castro Albuquerque R. Effects of immediate and delayed intraradicular preparation on bond strength of fiber posts. Indian J Dent Res. 2015;26(3):244-7. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.162879] [PMID]
15. Aleisa K, Al-Dwairi Z, Alghabban R, Glickman G, Hsu M-L. Effect of cement types and timing of cementation on the retentive bond strength of fiber posts. J Dent Sci. 2012;7(4):367-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2012.09.021]
16. Taneja S, Kumar P, Gupta N, Khan R. Influence of type of cement and their thickness on stress distribution at dentin-cement interface of computer-aided designed glass fiber post: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(3):228-32. [DOI:10.4103/JCD.JCD_457_18] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Vano M, Cury A, Goracci C, Chieffi N, Gabriele M, Tay F, et al. Retention of fiber posts cemented at different time intervals in canals obturated using an epoxy resin sealer. J Dent. 2008;36(10):801-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.016] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |