IMEMR
66.92
Volume 5, Issue 2 (2024)                   J Clinic Care Skill 2024, 5(2): 77-80 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Case/Series Report |
Subject:

Print XML PDF HTML Full-Text (HTML)

Ethics code: IR.YUMS.REC.1399.184


History

How to cite this article
Rabani S. Unilateral Multiple Renal Congenital Anomalies; A Case Report. J Clinic Care Skill 2024; 5 (2) :77-80
URL: http://jccs.yums.ac.ir/article-1-211-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
Authors S.M.R. Rabani *
Departments of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Departments of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Motahari Boulevard, Yasuj, Boyer-Ahmad, Iran. Postal Code: 75914-93686 (smrrabani@gmail.com)
Abstract   (169 Views)
Aims: The urinary tract is a site for common anomalies. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction and double collecting system are among the most common anomalies in the body, but gathering all of these anomalies reported in our patient and being unilateral may be a rare entity. Hereby, we report a case with such a rare condition.
Patient & Methods: The patient is a 19-year-old army male who presented with left lower quadrant abdominal pain after blunt abdominal trauma, accompanied by gross hematuria.
Findings: Ultrasonography suggested an ectopic pelvic left kidney with hydronephrosis and ureteropelvic junction obstruction with distal ureteral dilatation. Exploration was done through a Gibson’s retroperitoneal incision, and pyeloplasty accompanied by ureteroneocystostomy was carried out.
Conclusion: The collection of unilateral renal ectopia, double collecting system, lower moiety ureteropelvic junction obstruction, and finally ending to a common ureter with ureterovesical junction obstruction, seems to be a rare condition, but we found all of these in a young male.
Keywords:

References
1. Schedl A. Renal abnormalities and their developmental origin. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8(10):791-802. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/nrg2205]
2. Rosenblum ND. Overview of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). Mattoo TK, Baskin L, editors. Waltham (MA): UpToDate; 2015. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-29219-9_1]
3. Dressler GR. Advances in early kidney specification, development and patterning. Development. 2009;136(23):3863-74. [Link] [DOI:10.1242/dev.034876]
4. Hoshi M, Batourina E, Mendelsohn C, Jain S. Novel mechanisms of early upper and lower urinary tract patterning regulated by RetY1015 docking tyrosine in mice. Development. 2012;139(13):2405-15. [Link] [DOI:10.1242/dev.078667]
5. Renkema KY, Winyard PJ, Skovorodkin IN, Levtchenko E, Hindryckx A, Jeanpierre C, et al. Novel perspectives for investigating congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(12):3843-51. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfr655]
6. Chen F. Genetic and developmental basis for urinary tract obstruction. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(9):1621-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00467-008-1072-y]
7. Houat AP, Guimarães CTS, Takahashi MS, Rodi GP, Gasparetto TPD, Blasbalg R, et al. Congenital anomalies of the upper urinary tract: A comprehensive review. Radiographics. 2021;41(2):462-86. [Link] [DOI:10.1148/rg.2021200078]
8. Cinman NM, Okeke Z, Smith AD. Pelvic kidney: Associated diseases and treatment. J Endourol. 2007;21(8):836-42. [Link] [DOI:10.1089/end.2007.9945]
9. Van Den Bosch CM, Van Wijk JA, Beckers GM, Van Der Horst HJ, Schreuder MF, Bökenkamp A. Urological and nephrological findings of renal ectopia. J Urol. 2010;183(4):1574-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.041]
10. Didier RA, Chow JS, Kwatra NS, Retik AB, Lebowitz RL. The duplicated collecting system of the urinary tract: Embryology, imaging appearances and clinical considerations. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(11):1526-38. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00247-017-3904-z]
11. Whitten SM, Wilcox DT. Duplex systems. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21(11):952-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/pd.206]
12. Dino MS, Tefera AT, Gebreselassie KH, Akkasa SS, Mummed FO. Complete duplex of the left ureter with lower moiety hydronephrosis secondary to ureteral stone in adult. Case Rep Urol. 2022;2022:6552889. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2022/6552889]
13. Esposito C, Masieri L, Castagnetti M, Sforza S, Farina A, Cerulo M, et al. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): Technical considerations and results. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(6):667.e1-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.018]
14. Klein J, Gonzalez J, Miravete M, Caubet C, Chaaya R, Decramer S, et al. Congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Human disease and animal models. Int J Exp Pathol. 2011;92(3):168-92. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2613.2010.00727.x]
15. Yiee JH, Johnson-Welch S, Baker LA, Snodgrass WT, Wilcox DT. Histologic differences between extrinsic and intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2008;179(4S):355. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(08)61040-X]
16. Subotic U, Rohard I, Weber DM, Gobet R, Moehrlen U, Gonzalez R. A minimal invasive surgical approach for children of all ages with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8(4):354-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.07.004]
17. Peters CA. Pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2011;25(2):179-85. [Link] [DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0597]
18. Degheili JA, Moussa M, Termos S, Aoun B. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. In: Advances in medicine and biology. New York: Nova Medicine and Health; 2020. p. 75-7. [Link]
19. Rabani SM, Mousavizadeh A. The dilemma of ureterovesical junction obstruction. Nephrourol Mon. 2017. 9(5):e57201. [Link] [DOI:10.5812/numonthly.57201]
20. Babu R, Vittalraj P, Sundaram S, Shalini S. Pathological changes in ureterovesical and ureteropelvic junction obstruction explained by fetal ureter histology. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(3):240.E1-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.02.001]