IMEMR
EMRO
66.92
Index Copernicus
ICICICICICICICIC
Volume 1, Issue 3 (2020)
J Clinic Care Skill 2020, 1(3): 133-138 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2019/04/23 | Accepted: 2019/07/4 | Published: 2020/09/21
Received: 2019/04/23 | Accepted: 2019/07/4 | Published: 2020/09/21
How to cite this article
Zabolypour S, Alishapour M, Behnammoghadam M, Abbasi Larki R, Zoladl M. Comparing the Effect of Teach Back and Motivational Interview on the Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients. J Clinic Care Skill 2020; 1 (3) :133-138
URL: http://jccs.yums.ac.ir/article-1-52-en.html
URL: http://jccs.yums.ac.ir/article-1-52-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Medical Surgical Nursing Department, School of Nursing, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
2- Hazrate Zeynab Nursing School, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran ,maryam.alishapour@gmail.com
3- Critical Department, Nursing School, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
4- Urology Department, Medicine Faculty, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
5- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
2- Hazrate Zeynab Nursing School, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran ,
3- Critical Department, Nursing School, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
4- Urology Department, Medicine Faculty, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
5- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
Abstract (2301 Views)
Aims: Hypertension is one of the common, chronic, and preventable diseases which lifestyle change is the most important strategy for its prevention and treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of teach back and motivational interview on the blood pressure in hypertensive patients.
Materials & Methods: In this clinical trial, 81 hypertensive patients in the health centers of Yasuj city in 2018 were selected by purposive sampling method and divided into two intervention groups and one control group through random block allocation (27 people in each group). For one intervention group, 3 teach back sessions were conducted, and for the other intervention group, 5 group motivational interview sessions were performed, while the control group received only the usual care. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of samples were checked and recorded at the beginning of the study and two months after the intervention.
Findings: In post-test, systolic and diastolic blood pressure in teach back group decreased compared to the control group, but this decrease was not significant (p>0.05), while systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the motivational interview group decreased significantly compared to the control group (p<0.05). The difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreases in the motivational interview group was not significant compared to teach back group (p>0.05).
Conclusion: There is no difference between the effect of motivational interview on blood pressure level compared to teach back, but only the effect of motivational interview on the above variable is confirmed.
Materials & Methods: In this clinical trial, 81 hypertensive patients in the health centers of Yasuj city in 2018 were selected by purposive sampling method and divided into two intervention groups and one control group through random block allocation (27 people in each group). For one intervention group, 3 teach back sessions were conducted, and for the other intervention group, 5 group motivational interview sessions were performed, while the control group received only the usual care. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of samples were checked and recorded at the beginning of the study and two months after the intervention.
Findings: In post-test, systolic and diastolic blood pressure in teach back group decreased compared to the control group, but this decrease was not significant (p>0.05), while systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the motivational interview group decreased significantly compared to the control group (p<0.05). The difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreases in the motivational interview group was not significant compared to teach back group (p>0.05).
Conclusion: There is no difference between the effect of motivational interview on blood pressure level compared to teach back, but only the effect of motivational interview on the above variable is confirmed.
Keywords:
References
1. Joffres M, Falaschetti E, Gillespie C, Robitaille C, Loustalot F, Poulter N, et al. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in national surveys from England, the USA and Canada, and correlation with stroke and ischaemic heart disease mortality: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8):e003423. [Link] [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003423]
2. Muntner P, Whelton PK, Woodward M, Carey RM. A comparison of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure guideline and the 2017 American Diabetes Association diabetes and hypertension position statement for US adults with diabetes. Diabetes care. 2018;41(11):2322-9. [Link] [DOI:10.2337/dc18-1307]
3. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67-492. [Link] [DOI:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000573]
4. Jabalameli S, Neshatdoost HT, Moulavi H. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention on quality of life and blood pressure in female patients with hypertension. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci. 2010;15(2):88-97. [Persian] [Link]
5. Eghbali M, Khosravi A, Feizi A, Mansouri A, Mahaki B, Sarrafzadegan N. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control, and risk factors of hypertension among adults: a cross-sectional study in Iran. Epidemiol Health. 2018;40:e2018020. [Link] [DOI:10.4178/epih.e2018020]
6. Esteghamati A, Abbasi M, Alikhani S, Gouya MM, Delavari A, Shishehbor MH, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and risk factors associated with hypertension in the Iranian population: the national survey of risk factors for noncommunicable diseases of Iran. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21(6):620-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/ajh.2008.154]
7. Kazemi T, Hajihosseini M, Mashreghimoghadam H, Azdaki N, Ziaee M. Prevalence and determinants of hypertension among Iranian adults, Birjand, Iran. Int J Prev Med. 2017;8:36. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_103_16]
8. Elmer PJ, Obarzanek E, Vollmer WM, Simons-Morton D, Stevens VJ, Young DR, et al. Effects of comprehensive lifestyle modification on diet, weight, physical fitness, and blood pressure control: 18-month results of a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(7):485-95. [Link] [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00007]
9. Bas M, Donmez S. Self-efficacy and restrained eating in relation to weight loss among overweight men and women in Turkey. Appetite. 2009;52(1):209-16. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2008.09.017]
10. Chiu CW, Wong FKY. Effects of 8 weeks sustained follow-up after a nurse consultation on hypertension: a randomized trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(11):1374-82. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.018]
11. Ma C, Zhou Y, Zhou W, Huang C. Evaluation of the effect of motivational interviewing counselling on hypertension care. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95(2):231-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.011]
12. Dean SC, Kerry SM, Cappuccio FP, Oakeshott P. Pilot study of potential barriers to blood pressure control in patients with inadequately controlled hypertension. Fam Pract. 2007;24(3):259-62. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmm005]
13. Ataei E, Haghjoo M, Dalvandi A, Bakhshandeh H. Effect of self-care education on quality of life among patients with permanent pacemaker. Iran J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013;1(4):40-7. [Persian] [Link]
14. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. 3rd Edition. New York: Guilford Press; 2012. [Link]
15. Webber KH, Tate DF, Quintiliani LM. Motivational interviewing in internet groups: a pilot study for weight loss. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108(6):1029-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jada.2008.03.005]
16. Knight K, McGowan L, Dickens C, Bundy C. A systematic review of motivational interviewing in physical health care settings. Br J Health Psychol. 2006;11(Pt 2):319-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1348/135910705X52516]
17. Mirkarimi SK, Honarvar MR, Ariayi M, Bordi R, Kamran A. Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Adherence to Treatment in Patients with Hypertension. Horizon Med Sci. 2015;21(3):213-20. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.hms.21.3.213]
18. Navidian A, Abedi MR, Baghban I, Fatehizadeh M, Poursharifi H. Effect of motivational interviewing on blood pressure of referents suffering from hypertension. Kowsar Med J. 2010;15(2):115-21. [Persian] [Link]
19. Sharafi S, Jazayeri A, Saffari M, Movahedi A. Effect of motivational interview on athropometric indices and hypertension in overweight and obese adults. Iran J Nutr Sci Food Technol. 2018;13(4):11-20. [Persian] [Link]
20. Wilson FL, Baker LM, Nordstrom CK, Legwand C. Using the teach-back and Orem's Self-care Deficit Nursing theory to increase childhood immunization communication among low-income mothers. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2008;31(1):7-22. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/01460860701877142]
21. Sudore RL, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve care for patients with limited health literacy. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2009;16(1):20-9. [Link]
22. White M, Garbez R, Carroll M, Brinker E, Howie-Esquivel J. Is "teach-back" associated with knowledge retention and hospital readmission in hospitalized heart failure patients? J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013;28(2):137-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/JCN.0b013e31824987bd]
23. Abedi G, Naghibi A, Alizadeh M, Fakhrzadeh H, Sharifi F, Rezaei Rad M, Yosefi R, et al. Efficacy of the two educational methods: Traditional and electronic techniques in training of nutritional aspect to healthy life style in elderly. Iran J Diabetes Metab. 2013;13(1):9-20. [Persian] [Link]
24. Hojatzadeh A, Samavat T. Manual of blood pressure measurement. Tehran: Movaffagh Publication; 2012. [Persian] [Link]
25. Hardcastle SJ, Taylor AH, Bailey MP, Harley RA, Hagger MS. Effectiveness of a motivational interviewing intervention on weight loss, physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a randomized controlled trial with a 12-month post-intervention follow-up. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(1):40. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1479-5868-10-40]
26. McCarley P. Patient empowerment and motivational interviewing: Engaging patients to self-manage their own care. Nephrol Nurs J. 2009;36(4):409-13. [Link]
27. Ha Dinh TT, Bonner A, Clark R, Ramsbotham J, Hines S. The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016;14(1):210-47. [Link] [DOI:10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296]
28. Ranjbar S. Comparing the effect of education by Peers with education by Health Personnel on blood pressure and treatment adherence in patient with hypertension [Dissertation]. Yasuj: Yasuj University of Medical Sciences and Health Services; 2015. [Persian] [Link]
29. Tsay SL, Hung LO. Empowerment of patients with end-stage renal disease-a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004;41(1):59-65. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00095-6]