IMEMR
EMRO
66.92
Index Copernicus
ICICICICICICICIC
Volume 5, Issue 1 (2024)
J Clinic Care Skill 2024, 5(1): 33-39 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Ethics code: IR.AJUMS.REC.1399.223
History
Received: 2024/02/1 | Accepted: 2024/03/3 | Published: 2024/03/12
Received: 2024/02/1 | Accepted: 2024/03/3 | Published: 2024/03/12
How to cite this article
Babadi E, Abbaspoor Z, Ghanbari S, Mohammadi S, Javadnoori M. Rate of Cesarean Section in Hospitals Affiliated with Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran. J Clinic Care Skill 2024; 5 (1) :33-39
URL: http://jccs.yums.ac.ir/article-1-239-en.html
URL: http://jccs.yums.ac.ir/article-1-239-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
2- “Reproductive Health Promotion Research Center” and “Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery”, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
3- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
2- “Reproductive Health Promotion Research Center” and “Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery”, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
3- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract (926 Views)
Aims: The cesarean section rate in Iran is much higher than the rate recommended by the World Health Organization. Implementation of effective measures to reduce the cesarean rate requires proper analysis and classification. Robeson's classification can be useful in identifying the groups that play the most important role in the cesarean section rate. The present study was conducted to analyze the rate of cesarean section based on Robson's system in hospitals affiliated with Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Instrument & Methods: This multi-center cross-sectional study, in 2019, examined 950 pregnant women admitted for delivery or cesarean section in two teaching hospitals affiliated with Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran, using a convenient sampling method. The data collection tool was a checklist based on Robson's ten classification system. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22 software and descriptive-analytical statistical tests.
Findings: The overall cesarean rate was 48.94%. the largest relative contributions to the CS rate were group 5, group 10, and group 1, respectively. The main causes of cesarean section in all groups were previous cesarean section, fetal distress, and severe pre-eclampsia. The number of cesarean sections in midwife-led hospitals was less than in physician-centered hospitals.
Conclusion: Group 5 of Robeson's classification, representing repeated cesarean sections, contributed the most to the overall cesarean rate.
Instrument & Methods: This multi-center cross-sectional study, in 2019, examined 950 pregnant women admitted for delivery or cesarean section in two teaching hospitals affiliated with Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran, using a convenient sampling method. The data collection tool was a checklist based on Robson's ten classification system. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22 software and descriptive-analytical statistical tests.
Findings: The overall cesarean rate was 48.94%. the largest relative contributions to the CS rate were group 5, group 10, and group 1, respectively. The main causes of cesarean section in all groups were previous cesarean section, fetal distress, and severe pre-eclampsia. The number of cesarean sections in midwife-led hospitals was less than in physician-centered hospitals.
Conclusion: Group 5 of Robeson's classification, representing repeated cesarean sections, contributed the most to the overall cesarean rate.
Keywords:
References
1. Jenabi E, Khazaei S, Bashirian S, Aghababaei S, Matinnia N. Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: A systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(22):3867-72. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/14767058.2019.1587407]
2. Mascarello KC, Horta BL, Silveira MF. Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:105. [Link] [DOI:10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000389]
3. Acharya K, Paudel YR. Trend and sociodemographic correlates of cesarean section utilization in Nepal: evidence from demographic and health surveys 2006-2016. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:8888267. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2021/8888267]
4. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in cesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PloS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343]
5. Strambi N, Sorbi F, Bartolini GM,Forconi C, Sisti G, Seravalli V, et al. Non-Clinical Variables Influencing Cesarean Section Rate According to Robson Classification. Medicina, 2020;56(4):180. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/medicina56040180]
6. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of cesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6(6):e005671. [Link] [DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671]
7. Abedian Z, Nikpour M, Mokhber N, Ebrahimi S, Khani S. Evaluation of relationship between delivery mode and postpartum quality of life. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertility. 2010;13(3):47-53. [Persian] [Link]
8. Shariat M, Majlesi F, Azari S, Mahmoodi M. Cesaren section in maternity hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Payesh. 2002;1(3):5-10. [Persian] [Link]
9. Mohammadi S. Beyond 'Cesarean Overuse': Hospital-Based Audits of Obstetric Care and Maternal Near Miss in Tehran, Iran. 2016, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. [Link]
10. Pourshirazi M, Heidarzadeh M, Taheri M, Esmaily H, Babaey F, Talkhi N, et al. Cesarean delivery in Iran: a population-based analysis using the Robson classification system. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022;22(1):1-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-04517-1]
11. Azizi F. Cesarean delivery: Shocking increase. research in medicine. Research Med. 2007;31:191-193 [Persian] [Link]
12. Rafiei M, Saei Ghare M, Akbari M, Kiani F, Sayehmiri F, Sayehmiri K, et al. Prevalence, causes, and complications of cesarean delivery in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018;16(4):221. [Link] [DOI:10.29252/ijrm.16.4.221]
13. Hellerstein S, Feldman S, Duan,T. China's 50% cesarean delivery rate: is it too high. BJOG. 2015;122(2):160-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.12971]
14. Yazdizadeh B, Nedjat S, Mohammad K, Rashidian A, Changizi N, Majdzadeh R. Cesarean section rate in Iran, multidimensional approaches for behavioral change of providers: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:1159. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-11-159]
15. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. [Link]
16. Opiyo N, Kingdon C, Oladapo OT, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Bonet M, et al. Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary cesarean sections: WHO recommendations. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98(1):66.-8 [Link] [DOI:10.2471/BLT.19.236729]
17. Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, Mortazhejri S, Rader T, Petkovic J, et al. Non‐clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9(9):CD005528. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3]
18. Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, et al., Classifications for cesarean section: A systematic review. PloS One. 2011;6(1):e14566. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0014566]
19. Akadri AA, J Imaralu JO, Salami OF, Nwankpa CC, Adepoju AA, et al. Robson classification of cesarean births: implications for reducing cesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):243. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-05557-x]
20. Robson MS. Classification of cesarean sections. Fetal Maternal Med Rev. 2001;12(1):23-39. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S0965539501000122]
21. FIGO Working Group On Challenges In Care Of Mothers And Infants During Labour And Delivery. Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;135(2):232-3. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.001]
22. Hehir MP, et al. Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: A population-based analysis using the Robson 10-group classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):105.e1-105. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.012]
23. Eyi EGY, Mollamahmutoglu L. An analysis of the high cesarean section rates in Turkey by Robson classification. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(16):2682-92. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/14767058.2019.1670806]
24. Kelly S, Sprague A, Fell DB, Murphy P, Aelicks N, Guo Y, Fahey J, et al. Examining cesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(3):206-14. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30992-0]
25. Crosby DA, Murphy MM, Segurado R, Byrne F, Mahony R, Robson M, et al. Cesarean delivery rates using Robson classification system in Ireland: What can we learn?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;236:121-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.03.011]
26. Jadoon B, Assar TM, Abdel Rahman Nucier AA, Abdel Raziq HE, Abd El-Azym Saad AS, Amer WM. Analysis of the cesarean section rate using the 10-Group Robson classification at Benha University Hospital, Egypt. Women Birth. 2020;33(2):e105-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.009]
27. Pakdaman R, Firoozi M. Vaginal birth after cesarean section in Iran: A narrative review. J Midwifery Reprod Health. 2021;9(2). [Link]
28. Pinto P, Crispín-Milart PH, Rojo E, Adiego B. Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate in a Spanish hospital: Analysis of 6 year data according to the Robson classification. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;254:308-14. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.017]
29. Gu J, Karmakar-Hore S, Hogan ME, Azzam HM, Barrett JFR, Brown A, et al. Examining cesarean section rates in Canada using the modified Robson classification. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(6):757-65. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2019.09.009]
30. Smith DC, Phillippi JC, Lowe NK, Breman RB, Carlson NS, Neal JL, et al. Using the Robson 10‐group classification system to compare cesarean birth utilization between US centers with and without midwives. J Midwifery Women Health. 2020;65(1):10-21. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jmwh.13035]